Ethics. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):7
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Environmental Ethics (Excerpts)
Ethics. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):7
Monday, November 20, 2017
Ecology: An Ethical Perspective (Excerpts)
—
Monday, September 25, 2017
What Trees Feel, How They Communicate...
Excerpts from a great book...
When you know that trees experience pain and have memories and that tree parents live together with their children, then you can no longer just chop them down and disrupt their lives with large machines.
Forests are superorganisms with interconnections much like ant colonies…
Together, many trees create an ecosystem that moderates extremes of heat and cold, stores a great deal of water, and generates a great deal of humidity. And in this protected environment, trees can live to be very old.
Every tree, therefore, is valuable to the community and worth keeping around for as long as possible. And that is why even sick individuals are supported and nourished until they recover.
In the symbiotic community of the forest, not only trees but also shrubs and grasses—and possibly all plant species—exchange information this way.
When trees grow together, nutrients and water can be optimally divided among them all so that each tree can grow into the best tree it can be.
A tree can be only as strong as the forest that surrounds it.
“A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.”
Scientists have determined that slow growth when the tree is young is a prerequisite if a tree is to live to a ripe old age.
There are more life forms in a handful of forest soil than there are people on the planet. A mere teaspoonful contains many miles of fungal filaments. All these work the soil, transform it, and make it so valuable for the trees.
While we are on the subject of erosion: it is one of the forest’s most dangerous natural enemies. Soil is lost whenever there are extreme weather events, usually following particularly heavy downpours. If the forest soil cannot absorb all the water right away, the excess runs over the soil surface, taking small particles of soil with it.
The forest is really a gigantic carbon dioxide vacuum that constantly filters out and stores this component of the air. It’s true that some of this carbon dioxide does indeed return to the atmosphere after a tree’s death, but most of it remains locked in the ecosystem forever.
The spreadsheets that estimate lumber production need to be adjusted now that one third more biomass is accruing than a few decades ago. But what was that again? If you are a tree, slow growth is the key to growing old. Growth fueled by hefty additions of excess nitrogen from agricultural operations is unhealthy. And so the tried and tested rule holds true: less (carbon dioxide) is more (life-span).
If we want to use forests as a weapon in the fight against climate change, then we must allow them to grow old, which is exactly what large conservation groups are asking us to do.
Coniferous forests in the Northern Hemisphere influence climate and manage water in other ways, too. Conifers give off terpenes, substances originally intended as a defense against illness and pests.
Given this reciprocal relationship between trees and weather, forest ecosystems probably play an important role in slowing down climate change.
For ecosystems in Central Europe, regular rainfall is extremely important because water and forests share an almost unbreakable bond. Streams, ponds—even the forest itself—all these ecosystems depend on providing their inhabitants with as much stability as they can.
The forest floor acts as a huge sponge that diligently collects all the rainfall. The trees make sure that the raindrops don’t land heavily on the ground but drip gently from their branches. The loosely packed soil absorbs all the water, so instead of the raindrops joining together to form small streams that rush away in the blink of an eye, they remain trapped in the soil. Once the soil is saturated and the reservoir for the trees is full, excess moisture is released slowly and over the course of many years, deeper and deeper into the layers below the surface. It can take decades before the moisture once again sees the light of day.
In total, a fifth of all animal and plant species—that’s about six thousand of the species we know about—depend on dead wood.50 As I have explained, dead wood is useful because of its role as a nutrient recycler.
Sometimes dead wood is directly beneficial to trees, for example, when a downed trunk serves as a cradle for its own young. Young spruce sprout particularly well in the dead bodies of their parents. This is known as “nurse-log reproduction” in English and, somewhat gruesomely, as Kadaververjüngung, or “cadaver rejuvenation,” in German.
How often have we experienced warm spells in January or February without the oaks and beeches greening up? How do they know that it isn’t yet time to start growing again? We’ve begun to solve the puzzle with fruit trees, at least. It seems the trees can count! They wait until a certain number of warm days have passed, and only then do they trust that all is well and classify the warm phase as spring.
Beeches, for example, don’t start growing until it is light for at least thirteen hours a day. That in itself is astounding because to do this, trees must have some kind of ability to see.
The anticipated trajectory of a tree’s life can change at any time for any number of reasons. Its health depends on the stability of the forest ecosystem. It’s better if temperature, moisture, and light conditions don’t change abruptly because trees react extremely slowly. But even when all the external conditions are optimal, insects, fungi, bacteria, and viruses are always lurking, waiting for the chance to strike. That usually happens only when a tree gets out of balance.
The air in young pine forests is almost germfree, thanks to the phytoncides released by the needles. In essence, then, trees disinfect their surroundings.
Many of the companions that look after trees’ well-being in the forest (such as the microorganisms that make humus) are missing. Mycorrhizal fungi that help collect water and food are present only in low numbers. Urban trees, therefore, have to go it alone under the harshest conditions.
Silver birch bark has another surprise in store. The white color is because of the active ingredient betulin, its primary component. White reflects sunlight and protects the trunk from sunscald. It also guards the trunk against heating up in the warming rays of the winter sun, which could cause unprotected trees to burst. As birches are pioneer trees that often grow all alone in wide-open spaces without any neighbors to shade them, such a feature makes sense. Betulin also has antiviral and antibacterial properties and is an ingredient in medicines and in many skin care products.60 What’s really surprising is how much betulin there is in birch bark. A tree that makes its bark primarily out of defensive compounds is a tree that is constantly on the alert. In such a tree there is no carefully calibrated balance between growth and healing compounds. Instead, defensive armoring is being thrown up at a breakneck pace everywhere. Why doesn’t every species of tree do that? Wouldn’t it make sense to be so thoroughly prepared against attack that potential aggressors would breathe their last the moment they took the first bite?
Species that live in social groups don’t entertain this option because every individual belongs to a community that will look after it in times of need, warn it of impending dangers, and feed it when it is sick or in distress. Cutting back on defense saves energy, which the tree can then invest in producing wood, leaves, and fruit. Not so with the birches, which must be completely self-reliant if they are to survive. But they, too, grow wood—and indeed, they do so a lot faster—and they, too, want to, and do, reproduce. Where does all their energy come from? Can this species somehow photosynthesize more efficiently than others? No. The secret, it turns out, lies in wildly overtaxing their resources. Birches rush through life, live beyond their means, and eventually wear themselves out.
In the past few centuries, hunting has come to European forests as well, which, paradoxically, considerably increased the numbers of deer and wild boar. Thanks to massive feeding programs by hunters, who are mostly interested in increasing the number of antler-bearing stags, the population grew until today it is up to five times its natural level. German-speaking regions have one of the highest concentrations of herbivores in the world, so small beeches are finding it harder than ever to survive. And forestry is restricting their spread, as well.
Slowly but surely, fungi and insects are making their way across the Atlantic or the Pacific in imported lumber and establishing themselves in Europe.
The Asian long-horned beetle >> a threat. It probably traveled to Europe and other parts of the world from China in packing crates.
Habitats are defined by their features (water, terrain, topography) and by the local climate.
Trees act as huge air filters. Their leaves and needles hang in a steady breeze, catching large and small particles as they float by. Per year and square mile this can amount to 20,000 tons of material.
Trees trap so much because their canopy presents such a large surface area. In comparison with a meadow of a similar size, the surface area of the forest is hundreds of times larger, mostly because of the size difference between trees and grass. The filtered particles contain not only pollutants such as soot but also pollen and dust blown up from the ground. It is the filtered particles from human activity, however, that are particularly harmful. Acids, toxic hydrocarbons, and nitrogen compounds accumulate in the trees like fat in the filter of an exhaust fan above a kitchen stove. But not only do trees filter materials out of the air, they also pump substances into it. They exchange scent-mails and, of course, pump out phytoncides, both of which I have already mentioned.
Walkers who visit one of the ancient deciduous preserves in the forest I manage always report that their heart feels lighter and they feel right at home. If they walk instead through coniferous forests, which in Central Europe are mostly planted and are, therefore, more fragile, artificial places, they don’t experience such feelings. Possibly it’s because in ancient beech forests, fewer “alarm calls” go out, and therefore, most messages exchanged between trees are contented ones, and these messages reach our brains as well, via our noses. I am convinced that we intuitively register the forest’s health. Why don’t you give it a try?
Tree roots can breathe as well. If they didn’t, deciduous trees would die in winter when they discard their aboveground lungs. But the trees keep ticking over and their roots even grow a little, so energy must be produced with the help of the trees’ reserves, and for this the trees need oxygen. And that is why it is so awful for a tree if the soil around its trunk has been so compacted that the small air pockets in the soil have been crushed. The tree’s roots suffocate, or at least have difficulty breathing, with the result that the tree gets sick.
In 1981, the German journal Gartenamt reported that 4 percent of oak deaths in one American city happened because the trees were subjected to light every night.
Therefore, the color of organisms and objects is dictated by the color of the reflected light. And in the case of leaves on trees, this color is green.
What we are really seeing is waste light, the rejected part that trees cannot use. Beautiful for us; useless for the trees. Nature that we find pleasing because it reflects trash?
The color is the result of a metabolic disorder. Young developing leaves on normal trees are often tinged red thanks to a kind of sun block in their delicate tissue. This is anthocyanin, which blocks ultraviolet rays to protect the little leaves. As the leaves grow, the anthocyanin is broken down with the help of an enzyme. A few beeches or maples deviate from the norm because they lack this enzyme. They cannot get rid of the red color, and they retain it even in their mature leaves. Therefore, their leaves strongly reflect red light and waste a considerable portion of the light’s energy. Of course, they still have the blue tones in the spectrum for photosynthesis, but they are not achieving the same levels of photosynthesis as their green-leaved relatives. These red trees keep appearing in Nature, but they never get established and always disappear again. Humans, however, love anything that is different, and so we seek out red varieties and propagate them. One man’s trash is another man’s treasure is one way to describe this behavior, which might stop if people knew more about the trees’ circumstances.
The main reason we misunderstand trees, however, is that they are so incredibly slow. Their childhood and youth last ten times as long as ours. Their complete life-span is at least five times as long as ours.
It takes five hundred years from the time a national park is established to get to this point. Had large areas of an old deciduous forest that had seen only modest commercial use been put under protection, it would take only two hundred years to reach this stage.
There’s a common misconception about the appearance of old-growth forests in Europe, should they come to pass. Laypeople often assume that shrubby growth will take over the landscape and forests will become impenetrable. Where today the forests that predominate are at least partially accessible, tomorrow chaos will rule. Forest preserves untouched by foresters for more than a hundred years prove the opposite. Because of the deep shade, wild flowers and shrubs don’t have a chance, so the color brown (from old leaves) predominates on the natural forest floor. The small trees grow extremely slowly and very straight, and their side branches are short and narrow. The old mother trees dominate, and their flawless trunks stretch to the sky like the columns in a cathedral. In contrast to this, there is much more light in managed forests, because trees are constantly being removed. Grass and bushes grow in the gaps, and tangles of brambles prevent detours off the beaten path. When trees are felled and their crowns are left lying on the ground, the debris creates further obstacles. The whole forest presents a troubled and downright messy picture. Old-growth forests, however, are basically very accessible. There are just a few thick dead trunks lying on the ground here and there, which offer natural resting spots. Because the trees grow to be so old, few dead trees fall. Other than that, nothing much happens. Few changes are noticeable in a person’s lifetime. Preserves where managed forests are allowed to develop into old-growth forests have a calming effect on Nature and offer better experiences for people seeking rest and relaxation.
We are now discovering that animals share many human emotions. And not just mammals, which are closely related to us, but even insects such as fruit flies. Researchers in California have discovered that even these tiny creatures might dream. Sympathy for flies?
Not to put too fine a point on it, we use living things killed for our purposes. Does that make our behavior reprehensible? Not necessarily. After all, we are also part of Nature, and we are made in such a way that we can survive only with the help of organic substances from other species. We share this necessity with all other animals. The real question is whether we help ourselves only to what we need from the forest ecosystem, and—analogous to our treatment of animals—whether we spare the trees unnecessary suffering when we do this.
That means it is okay to use wood as long as trees are allowed to live in a way that is appropriate to their species. And that means that they should be allowed to fulfill their social needs, to grow in a true forest environment on undisturbed ground, and to pass their knowledge on to the next generation. And at least some of them should be allowed to grow old with dignity and finally die a natural death.
I, for one, welcome breaking down the moral barriers between animals and plants. When the capabilities of vegetative beings become known, and their emotional lives and needs are recognized, then the way we treat plants will gradually change, as well.
This is what this ecosystem achieves: the fullness of life with tens of thousands of species interwoven and interdependent.
Katsuhiko Matsunaga, a marine chemist at the Hokkaido University, discovered that leaves falling into streams and rivers leach acids into the ocean that stimulate the growth of plankton, the first and most important building block in the food chain. More fish because of the forest? The researcher encouraged the planting of more trees in coastal areas, which did, in fact, lead to higher yields for fisheries and oyster growers.
Reference: The Hidden Life of Trees: What They Feel, How They Communicate—Discoveries from a Secret World by Peter Wohlleben
Monday, August 28, 2017
Lost in the "American Dream"...
“We risk being the first people in history to make our illusions so vivid, so persuasive, so lifelike that we begin to inhabit them.”
But is “risk” even the right word anymore? In many ways, this is not a warning about the future but a description of the present. We are already living inside those constructions. The idea that belief is self-validating, independent of evidence, has become a defining feature of the American cultural landscape.
Treating reality as optional, and treating invention as truth, is not uniquely American, but it is amplified here at scale. The United States functions as a kind of global accelerator of narrative, where spectacle, ideology, and identity often outweigh shared factual grounding. What emerges is not simply disagreement about interpretation, but fragmentation of reality itself.
As Kurt Andersen argues, this tendency did not appear suddenly. It is deeply embedded in the country’s history, shaped by religious revivalism, entrepreneurial myth-making, entertainment culture, and an unusually strong tradition of individual belief over collective epistemic constraint. From Salem witch trials to new religious movements, from P. T. Barnum to modern conspiracy cultures, from Hollywood to digital media ecosystems, fantasy and reality have long been intertwined in American life.
The result is a society where the boundary between fact and invention can become unstable, and where competing narratives do not merely interpret reality differently but often replace it entirely.
In that sense, the question is not whether we “risk” living in our illusions. It is how fully we already do.
How the U.S. Lost Its Mind
The nation's current post-truth moment is the ultimate expression of mind-sets that have made America exceptional throughout its history. "You are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts."
Thursday, July 27, 2017
What should every citizen know about ecology?
Cited
Berkowitz AR, Ford ME, and Brewer CA. 2005. A framework for integrating ecological literacy, civics literacy and environmental citizenship in environmental education. In: Johnson EA and Mappin MJ (Eds). Environmental education or advocacy: perspectives of ecology and education in environmental education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
References
What should every citizen know about ecology? Rebecca Jordan, Frederick Singer, John Vaughan, and Alan Berkowitz Front Ecol Environ 2009; 7, doi:10.1890/070113
Friday, July 21, 2017
Unifying Anthropocentrism and Ecocentrism
Reference: Unifying Anthropocentrism and Ecocentrism. Emmelhainz, R. (2016)
The Modern Conservative Moral System & 'Environmentalism'
- First, there is the idea that man is above nature in a moral hierarchy, that nature is there (put there by God) purely for human use and exploitation. There are other interpretations of the Judeo-Christian Bible (such as the stewardship metaphor promoted by former Vice President Al Gore); however, the resilience of the former inhibits changes in practices and beliefs about global warming.
- Second, there is the Let-the-Market-Decide ideology, in which the market is both natural and moral*it’s the Decider, who rewards market discipline and punishes lack of it; there should be no authority higher than that of the market. Hence no regulations, low or no taxes, no workers’ protections or unions, no tort cases. Thus, environmental regulation and government subsidies for sustainable energy, green technology, and green jobs are seen as government interference in the market, and hence immoral. But as the recent world economic collapse has clearly shown, markets require regulation to function effectively and in the public interest. The anti-tax crusade in California has similarly led to the bankruptcy of the state and widespread disasters for the public good.
- Third, conservatives tend to think more in terms of direct rather than systemic causation. But phenomena like global warming work by systemic, not direct causation.
- Fourth, present-day market fundamentalism assumes that greed is good. It supports the view that market principles should govern our conflicts between environmentalism and economics. One such principle is cost benefit analysis (CBA). The basic math of CBA uses subtraction: the benefits minus the costs summed over time indefinitely. Now those ‘‘benefits’’ and ‘‘costs’’ are seen in monetary terms, as if all values involving the future of the earth were monetary. CBA is just the wrong paradigm for thinking about global warming, however. For example, as any economist knows, future money is worth less than present money. How much less? The equation has a factor that tells you how much: e (2.781828 . . .) to the power minus-d times t, where t is time and d is the discount rate. Now e to a negative power gets very small very fast. Just how fast depends on the exact discount rate (that is, interest rate), but any reasonable one is a disaster. The equation says that, in a fairly short time, any monetary benefits compared to costs will tend to zero. That says there are no long-term benefits to saving the earth!
- Fifth, aligned with CBA is the Equivalent Value Metaphor. To find out the monetary value of the environment in a particular case, think in terms of the ‘‘services’’ that the environment in this case provides to human beings. Then compute what it would cost private enterprise to provide the equivalent services. That is the value of the ‘‘environmental service.’’ If a developer is willing to pay that amount or more, development should proceed. In cases of development versus conservation, compute the profits from development that would be ‘‘lost’’ to the developer under conservation, and consider that the value of the conservation. That is the money to be paid to the developer if conservation is chosen. In both cases, the natural environment, which lasts indefinitely, is destroyed and sacrificed to short-term profit.
- Sixth, conservative populism views liberalism negatively, especially through the frame of the Liberal Elite: the tax-and-spend, sushi-eating, latte-drinking, Birkenstock-wearing, do-gooder, know-it-all liberals! This view tends to make conservative populists doubt and reject the science behind reports that establish the existence of and impact of global warming.
Friday, June 16, 2017
The Dual Experience of Conservation Work: Purpose and Isolation
Engagement in conservation science and practice can provide a strong sense of purpose, while also constituting a socially and professionally isolating vocation.
Over a year ago, I transitioned my work to focus on improving the relationship between human societies and the natural world. The approach developed in this context is based on a science-informed framework and associated methodological tools designed to support that objective. At present, such approaches primarily attract a specialized audience, despite their relevance at broader societal scales. The underlying assumption is that these changes are not optional in the long term, but will become necessary under accelerating environmental pressures. The aim is to develop and maintain capacity in anticipation of this transition.
Initial engagement from a committed subset of practitioners and supporters has been encouraging, particularly in relation to both the tools and the conceptual framework. However, broader adoption remains limited. This delay can be understood in relation to structural and cultural factors, including strong forms of individualism, uneven ecological literacy, and persistent gaps in understanding of anthropogenic environmental change. Additional constraints arise from resistance to revising established assumptions about the relationship between humans and the broader biosphere.
In practice, conservation work may also be socially isolating. In some global contexts, environmental advocacy is associated with significant personal risk. In my current context in the northeastern United States, and more specifically within the Boston metropolitan region, the constraints are of a different nature. They are less related to safety and more associated with epistemic and communicative barriers, including differing thresholds for integrating scientific information into action.
This divergence between knowledge and implementation is a well-documented challenge in environmental governance and public understanding of science. Even in highly educated environments, the translation of ecological knowledge into behavioral or institutional change is neither automatic nor consistent.
Nevertheless, sustained engagement with figures such as E. O. Wilson, alongside collaboration with conservation scientists and practitioners, provides an important intellectual and professional foundation. These relationships continue to inform both the purpose and continuity of the work.
Sunday, May 21, 2017
Etho Fact: Is 2nd Degree Knowledge Human Specific?
From Darwin's The Descent of Man:
"The difference in mind between man and the higher animals, great as it is, certainly is one of degree and not of kind."
According to some, one of the defining features of being human is our ability to access second-order knowledge: not just holding a belief, but holding a belief about a belief. In other words, we can question the truthfulness of our own thoughts.
Except that this is not uniquely human.
An animal may react fearfully to a stuffed predator, then, upon closer inspection, revise its assessment and conclude that it poses no danger. This kind of metacognition, or knowledge about knowledge, has been observed and documented in dogs, cats, apes, cetaceans, birds, fish, and many other animals.
The history of ethology has been, in many ways, a steady dismantling of human exceptionalism. One after another, the traits we once claimed as uniquely ours, tool use, culture, language, planning, teaching, self-recognition, empathy, and metacognition have been found elsewhere in the living world.
What remains is not evidence that humans are superior to the estimated 8.7 million other species with whom we share this planet. We are different, certainly, but not uniquely so.
With each new discovery, it becomes harder to justify the way humans view and treat the rest of the web of life.
Actively resisting the evidence and denying other species the right to live for purposes unrelated to our survival may be among the few distinctly human traits.
Sunday, March 5, 2017
What's It All About?
“What small natural detail did you notice today that changed the way you understood a place?”
We have a responsibility to ourselves and to one another, as humans embedded in the broader web of life, to remain ecologically and ecosophically informed. Only through a grounded understanding of ecological realities can we act with care, ethical clarity, and attentiveness.
Ecosophical Perspectives Themes
1. Living World
Ecology, biodiversity, ethology, natural history, environment, conservation
The more than human field of attention.
2. Field Practice and Observation
Field notes, participatory/citizen science, science
How knowledge is gathered through practice.
3. Ecological Thoughts
Philosophy, ethics, ecoliteracy, sustainability
My ecosophical framework.
4. Society and Politics
Society, politics
General civic and cultural context that is not identity-specific.
5. Bezañ Vretonez
My Breton identity and cultural reclamation
Distinct theme as a lived lineage and act of return
6. Reading Notes
Reading notes
Interpretive engagement with external texts.
7. Réflections
My authored writing (although field notes are also self-expression)
A distinct voice register, intentionally separated.
8. Lived Ecology
Wellness
Embodied experience and daily ecological life.
Saturday, March 4, 2017
Alone in a World of Wounds
Friday, March 3, 2017
My Ecosophy



